LilMichaelBC 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 Who would win?Matt Zarth when he was a Junior or John Fahy now . I am leaning more to Zarth because he is more experience. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FalconWrestling 147 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 is weight meant to be a factor? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LilMichaelBC 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 That's what i forgot to put. No if they was both at 112 because that's the middle weight between them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ManBearPig 3 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 im waiting for the Fahy vs Harlow topic this stuff is getting riduclous Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cougars_119 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 as far as technique id say fahy. but im gonna go with zarth just being older and so much stronger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LilMichaelBC 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 I bet u would but are you helping out next year if we gotta coach? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krauziewicz 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 I bet u would but are you helping out next year if we gotta coach?i dont get itwhats this got to do with anything Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LilMichaelBC 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 That was me talking to ManBearPig Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ManBearPig 3 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 i help out with the less than mentally capable children at bullitt central Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LilMichaelBC 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 that made laugh me laugh harder than when adam showed me his hairy and non hairy leg . u went there too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OhWhatASlideBY 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 i would say zarth just cause he beat bradbury and i feel bradbury is better than fahy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ukpridewrestler 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 And Jarvis beat bradbury Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OhWhatASlideBY 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 And Jarvis beat bradbury.....okay? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tc125 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 well jack i think he was emplying that since bradbury is better than fahey, and jarvis beat bradbury, then jarvis could beat fahey. no need to get testy... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PD 2 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 Here we go back to jarvis again.That comparison only works if you assume that Bradbury has not improved at all between last year and this year. Judging from the way he went through state this year I would say he improved quite a bit. So saying that because Bradbury from this year is better than fahy, therfore Jarvis from last year is better than fahy doesn't work. Jarvis didn't beat Bradbury from this year, he beat Bradbury from last year ... 2 different wrestlers. In either case I don't think fahy would beat Zarth this year even at the same weight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ankle_pick111 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 if fahy and zarth weighed the same i think fahy could probably take him. if zarth won it would most likely be becuase strength or expirence but fahy is a really good wrestler Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LilMichaelBC 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 It still would be a good match Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ankle_pick111 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 yes a very good match i would say Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
~CREEK~ 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 Agreed. But i'll say Zarth wins in a major decision Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tc125 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 if fahy and zarth weighed the same i think fahy could probably take him. if zarth won it would most likely be becuase strength or expirence but fahy is a really good wrestlerand zarth isn't? if you ask me matt zarths technique is just as good, if not better than faheys. the only reason zarth didn't dominate state, like fahey did, is because of the level of competition at 103. not saying 103 is terrible, but no one can argue 119 wasn't a lot tougher. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
standing granby 20 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 tc125's right. Zarth (2009) would stick Fahy (2009), but to compare them at diff. ages and weights then they are now is futile. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ankle_pick111 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 and zarth isn't? if you ask me matt zarths technique is just as good, if not better than faheys. the only reason zarth didn't dominate state, like fahey did, is because of the level of competition at 103. not saying 103 is terrible, but no one can argue 119 wasn't a lot tougher.by saying fahy is a good wrestler that does not mena im saying zarth is not im just saying fahy might get beat but fahy is still a good wrestler no matter what the outcome of the match was Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grapplehed 8 Report post Posted March 9, 2009 by saying fahy is a good wrestler that does not mena im saying zarth is not im just saying fahy might get beat but fahy is still a good wrestler no matter what the outcome of the match wasCan you translate that jibberish please? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OhWhatASlideBY 0 Report post Posted March 10, 2009 yea i would say matt is more technical. i wrestled with him everyday. he knows everything and and can do everything good. i dont think i have ever seen anyone out class mat in strength or technique other than that nasty kid from rietz! but then again like people have said already by fahys senior year he will probably be better than matt was his senior year. but by that time matt will be a D1 college wrestler, and those guys are are just sick.none the less fahy has got a long time left to wrestle and it will take a good kid to beat him, no doubt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
385 109 Report post Posted March 10, 2009 Seriously... Fahy v Livingston Merritt, or Fahy v Harrison Courtney. Its getting ridiculous. And is no longer even entertaining. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites