grappler-of-old 44 Report post Posted March 9, 2006 Another thread brought this up. I actually thnk we should have 2 catagories here. The 1st toughest to place top 6. The 2nd the most balanced wt. class. (A class where several could have placed top in the state.) I don't have my picks yet. I just thought about this and decided to ask. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern112 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2006 Another thread brought this up. I actually thnk we should have 2 catagories here. The 1st toughest to place top 6. The 2nd the most balanced wt. class. (A class where several could have placed top in the state.) I don't have my picks yet. I just thought about this and decided to ask. 125 was pretty darn tough this year, there were kids that are potential champs at other weight classes wrestling at 125..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mat_Hawk_11 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2006 i beileve 135 was a pretty tough cookie this year & maby next year also! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chitna06 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2006 The toughest and probally most balanced was 145 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gatorade12 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2006 i beileve 135 was a pretty tough cookie this year & maby next year also! i disagree big time with the exception of murton anyone on the opposite side couldve made it to the finals; easy to place in impossible to win unless of course your jacob murton Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grappler-of-old 44 Report post Posted March 10, 2006 OK I have my picks but 1st I will give you my criteria. This is based on what I have seen this last year, some of this comes only from the state tourney. I don't get to see as much as Ranger and some of the others on here. I first came up with a criteria that goes like this. "5" star == An excelant wrestler "4" star == A great wrestler "3" star == A good wrestler "2" star == An above average wrestler "1" star == An average wrestler The toughest wt. class would have the highest number of 5 star wrestlers. 145 had 4 "5" star wrestlers. 152 had 2 "5" star and 11 "3" star 125 had 2 "5" star and 5 "3" star 189 had 2 "5" star and 7 "2" star 103 had 1 "5" star and 5 "4" star 215 had 1 "5" star and 4 "4" star 160 had 1 "5" star and 3 "4" star 112 had 1 "5" star and 3 "3" star 135 had 1 "5" star and 2 "3" star 140 had 6 "4" star 119 had 3 "4" star and 3 "3" star 130 had 3 "4" star and 3 "2" star 171 had 2 "4" star Hwt had 4 "3" star Most balanced 140 Had 6 "4" star and 5 "3" star. (By far the most balanced) went 12 deep. 4 non placers Golsby, Stewart, Knight, and Sheehan. 119 171 145 The rest are about equal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ranger123 43 Report post Posted March 10, 2006 I would add Ervin to your 5 star guys at 145 (assuming your 3 are Courtney, Banks, Aylor, Wilson). Didn't he beat Wilson a couple weeks before region? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grappler-of-old 44 Report post Posted March 10, 2006 I mentioned that I did not see much of many of these wrestlers. I based it on the state tourney. Ervin only defeated Winchester 5-1, Lost to Banks by 7, then for. his way out. What happened to Ervin to cause him to forfeit out? P.S. It seemed like there were a lot of forfeits this year at the state tourney. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Happy Pappy 0 Report post Posted March 10, 2006 I asked one of their coaches at the hotel and he said that Ervin reinjured his ankle. I believe he suffered the orginal injury a few weeks before state. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grapplinfan 0 Report post Posted March 12, 2006 Ervin originally got hurt at Christian Co invitational, the way i heard it. That was indeed, a few weeks before state. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragons275 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2006 Why is heavy weight always over looked they had mike clark kyle goodrich jason hardin adam burdin robert dunn josh young corey peters hall mat balinger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grappler-of-old 44 Report post Posted March 27, 2006 Dragon no offence because I like the big boys, it is just I didn't think that any of the HWTs this year were exceptional wrestlers. I think there were many of them what were good wrestlers just not many great or exceptional wrestlers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragons275 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2006 no offense taken it was just these were the top names in heavy weight this year that i and other heavy weights talked about Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
THE_BOP!!!!! 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2006 dragon you cant forget lawson from doss hes good but then he got injered Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragons275 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2006 bop thanks that mean a lot coming from u but u were a big name in jefferson county but u werent some one that was talked about in western and eastern kentucky Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
THE_BOP!!!!! 0 Report post Posted March 28, 2006 I KNO I THINK ITS BECAUSE I DIDNT DO SO GOOD AT REGIONS OR STATE I WENT 2 AND OUT LOSING TO LOGAN BUTLER AND OP McCUBBINS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
