SnapDrag 2 Report post Posted February 5, 2010 There still should be one1-4 matchups cause 1. some regions are stronger than others 2. because of 1, there will be higher seeds not winning. if there are 1-4 matchups, it doesn't wipe out the accomplishment of winning region. 3. example: 1 seed places 4th but is ranked 3rd in state, should he not wrestle a 1? a weaker region has an upset and 3 wins, he shouldnt have to face a 2 from another region cause its weaker. it all sounds good and would be fun to see but it is too complicated too figure outit wouldnt be too complicated if ranger would just leave his wife and kids, quit his job and dedicated himself 100% to the rankings. come on ranger, where are your priorities? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ranger123 43 Report post Posted February 6, 2010 it wouldnt be too complicated if ranger would just leave his wife and kids, quit his job and dedicated himself 100% to the rankings. come on ranger, where are your priorities?It's not really all that complicated. I could pull it off pretty easily (I think), probably with my laptop tied behind my back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
myGSP 4 Report post Posted February 6, 2010 it wouldnt be too complicated if ranger would just leave his wife and kids, quit his job and dedicated himself 100% to the rankings. come on ranger, where are your priorities?I heard he did, moved to Alaska I think. But only dedicating himself 99% to the rankings 1% to the BEARS. :-D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
