maddog33

i thought over all fahy should have got it....it was a very boring state finals...atleast fahy put on a clinic.....zarths match was good but other than that it was boring a freshman techs his opp in the final and does not get it...thats not right...the guy that harrison had was not good yet he got the first take down granted harrison still beat him..but it was not no where near impressive

if i was going to vote it would be fahy he is the best techinal wrestler i have seen....i think he should win..unless he fall apart u never know

I would like to know about what refs to look out for....who should be there and who should not..i know i would like cattan,barnett or jim shaw..who else is good..i have not seen all of them this year..

who are we talking about here?

maybe that is the case saint...i did not think of that but it makes sense..i guess he got beat but still thinks he is the best....i think joe carr jr just got lucky..i bet any other day all the guys he beat would have beat him..it makes sense now...thanks blake

how can you say that its not always the best wrestler that places..thats stupid....thats exactly what happens...th better wrestlers get metals and the others dont

you probably dont want region...then have to put up with all the crap...if u think reg season is bad wait till u get a region

i think every one on here makes good sense but whs.....read a rules book julian tackett will mail u one

i dont have anyone one there that i even know personally...its ust not hard to see that.....oh well

i guess i dont see why not...

yeah berding never had a chance..i dont know that he ever won a match at state....i know he never won a regional...kevin copenhier from desales was pretty good....he kinda just gave up though.....

he was a first year ref last year wasnt he...how did he manage that..

michael berding is a joke...i seriously laughed...and i never laugh....what about chris reiser..desales....darren is the only one i can really see...maybe joe

but you did not say anything bad that would make him want to defend his son....you CLEARLY stated that the fault was not on the kid but on the official....no apologys necessary..maybe he should apologize for getting so defensive

i dont think any apologys are necessary...people get on here to discuss things...saint you did not say anything wrong so you really do not need to apologize...he took it wrong and you corrected it...if you cant talk on here with saying sorry there is no reason to have this site to communicate....